Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren

Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren

Das sagen Bewerter

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

HEY THERE! My situation is a bit different from these other reviews. I did the following: 1. Applied to several jobs(4 by now). 2. Passed CCAT and aced all assessments with flying colours. 3.... Mehr ansehen

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

This is very clearly a scam. When searching the web for the names of people who have left positive reviews on trustpilot these individuals are either names from LinkedIn with no record of working... Mehr ansehen

Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen

Excellent pay and transparent (if tough) requirements. The CCAT and hiring pipeline is hard: but it is real and is not a scam. It's hard because Crossover is looking for the very best talent out there... Mehr ansehen

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

In 2023, I bought CrossOver for $74. When the license expired, I didn’t receive the promised discount for renewal. Instead, CodeWeavers keeps trying to sell me an annual license for the same price... Mehr ansehen

Unternehmensdetails

  1. Personaldienstleister

Informationen, die aus verschiedenen externen Quellen stammen

Crossover teams are assembled from the top 1% of talent across 130 countries. Challenge yourself to become a part of the cloud team revolution.


Kontaktinformationen

  • Congress Avenue 401, 78701, Austin, Vereinigte Staaten

  • crossover.com

1,6

Ungenügend

TrustScore 1.5 von 5

98 Bewertungen

5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Stern

Hat keine negativen Bewertungen beantwortet

So nutzt dieses Unternehmen Trustpilot

Erfahren Sie, woher die Bewertungen stammen und wie sie ausgewertet und moderiert werden.

Unternehmen auf Trustpilot dürfen keine finanziellen oder anderweitigen Anreize oder Gegenleistungen für das Verbergen von Bewertungen anbieten. Bewertungen spiegeln die Meinung einzelner Nutzer wider und nicht die von Trustpilot. Mehr erfahren

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

I found Crossover on Linkedin.

I found Crossover on Linkedin.
I am looking for a remote job. And I applied.
About a week later, I received an email and a test. It looks simple, and the email said it should take no more than 2 hours. But it's really not that simple, when implementing a user registration program at a price, with a discount over a period of time. Although he emphasized that the test should take no more than 2 hours, he gave me up to 2 days to submit the test.
With 15 years of software experience, I struggled with 4 hours to complete. Most of the time is testing with many special cases. Although quite satisfied with the results. but then I got a pretty general rejection email.
I started to have doubts because I had never taken such a test. And I started to search...

There are countless complaints about this company. Luckily I only had to spend a few wasted hours.
I think people should stay away.

7. Mai 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Too good to be true? It seems the answer is yes!

I saw the job posting for Crossover on LinkedIn and decided to find out more about it since it seemed too good to be true. I'm so glad I did. What really made my decision easier was reading the positive reviews from people who allegedly work there and managed to pass that insanely difficult test. The grammar, spelling, and sentence structure in their reviews are atrocious! LOL!

28. April 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

I'm cross; it's over

Like scores of others here, I wasted time and care on Crossover's Mickey Mouse testing for no job. I don't know what their real game is - feeding testing data to an AI, perhaps - but their standards are suspiciously impossible to satisfy.

29. April 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Poor choice for employer branding and reputation

Awful experience. Spent 3 hours, qualifying positively across 5 stages for a job application.

5 mins after I completed after those 3 hours, I was declined and the autoresponder shared that I was not a fit for the role. A huge waste of candidate's time, and a poor reflection on employers.

Never use this as an employer.

11. März 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Applied for accounts payable job which…

Applied for accounts payable job which doesn’t need CPA, ACCA or CA but they need all this qualifications to do normal accounts payable job. Waste of time, they make you feel like you are unworthy.

11. März 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Avoid at all costs

Avoid at all costs. I would never want to work for a company who uses this awful tool to hire for a position.

12. März 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Trash process

Trash process, don't waste your time solving their impassable test, They are not based on scientific studies like they claim, even software engineers at MAANG would struggle with this test.

14. Februar 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternen

AI in HR instead of Human Reviews? You be the judge!

I would say the application process is fairly streamlined and straightforward. Yes, there are tests and practicals to complete, but if you think the job is right for you, why complain?

Where I do want to voice a concern is in the review and response category. I got a response after only a couple of hours of completing my final practical exercise telling me I was not selected to move forward for the position I applied for. Yes, a bit of a heart-smasher, but what bothers me is the turnaround time being so fast. This tells me that there is likely not a human reviewing applications even at this stage and that you are being vetted by their in-house (or external!) AI system. If I'm wrong here, please respond. If I am right, I can see how a lot of talented candidates are falling through the cracks, which is a shame. What I would offer is this: IF the applications are being vetted automatically by your HR-AI, THEN I would suggest training the AI to also give applicants constructive feedback on where they erred in their applications, to better improve the chances of repeat applications making it through to next steps in the process.

7. Februar 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternen

I have read many of the negative reviews...

I have read many of the negative responses.
Understand this, that the so-called "cognitive assessment" is really an IQ test. They cannot call it that for obvious reasons. So no surprise it bears no relationship to what you will do on the job. No IQ test does.

I got to the cognitive assessment part, and wanted to do some research on Crossover before I wasted my time. I am highly intelligent, but tend to do badly with timed Whiz Kid tests. 18 seconds per question? I hate that!!!!

A real IQ test takes 2 or 3 hours to do. While the outcome of their "cognitive assessment" may correlate to your actual intelligence, many would say it is not a proper test.

I think I will try to take that test anyway, just to see how I do. But one of my impediments for tests like that is that I like to spend time on each question, particularly if the question is interesting. Nope. Do that any you will go down in flames.

For once I would like to see an intelligence test that is not so damned time critical.

One spoke of an unexpected Chrome update during the testing, which disqualified him. I use Firefox on Linux, and I never get those annoying prompts. Still, another running application might kick up a prompt and steal the focus.

Overall, I get negative "vibes" for Crossover, and will not rely on it for my main income, even if I do scale all the hoops and run the gauntlets. It does have a "too good to be true" odor to it.

17. Dezember 2023
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen

Learning in high Optempo

I have learned so much working for this company and really love their data based conclusions. I have worked for other organizations where decisions were taken on a whim and this company has a clear direction. The Optempo is very high which can be stressful but the pay, fully remote position, time flexibility, and professional development make it worth it.

15. November 2023
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

System Engineer

I started the shift and go into the details of work with with a good job culture. There is some query which are difficult but that are interesting to work and the work culture with freedom is best part.

1. September 2023
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Overall view about company

Firstly, the people in my team are very supportive so it is nice to work in the company. The second thing is that you will get paid for what you do.

13. November 2023
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen

Dynamic and Rewarding Remote Role

I've found my experience to be both challenging and rewarding. Working remotely for 40 hours a week, I've been able to balance my professional and personal life effectively.
The job has met and surpassed my expectations in several ways. The flexibility of remote work, combined with a supportive team and management, has been a pleasant surprise. The pay is competitive and certainly more attractive than many local job options. The hiring procedure is thorough, which might be overwhelming for some candidates.

13. November 2023
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung

So funktioniert Trustpilot

Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.

Unternehmen können über automatische Einladungen zur Bewertungsabgabe einladen. Diese Bewertungen werden mit dem Hinweis „verifiziert“ versehen, um darauf hinzuweisen, dass es sich um echte Erfahrungen handelt.

Erfahren Sie mehr über die verschiedenen Arten von Bewertungen.

Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.

Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.

Hier ​finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.

Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.

Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.

Erfahren Sie mehr