The "Grass Community Discord" is literally using the Grass name and logo to discuss the Grass app. If it was "not related to reviewing the Grass app" then why create it, promote it, and le... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren
Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren
The "Grass Community Discord" is literally using the Grass name and logo to discuss the Grass app. If it was "not related to reviewing the Grass app" then why create it, promote it, and le... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Grass was a great project that turned into a scam. 2 Devices, 2.38m uptime points, 592 days and only 3.45$ allocation. Also the team promised to allocate 170million tokens (worth around 85m$) but only... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Scammers, these people really believe that everyone apart from them are id--ts. You have an useless guy replying to reviews trying to make it look like what they have done was transparent. Why you did... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
I've been part of the Grass project for nearly two years, and the level of innovation they've delivered, along with their commitment to users, is truly exceptional. They've already achieved impressive... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmen hat geantwortet
Grass is a network sharing application that enables users to sell their unused internet.
Kanada
Keine aktuellen Aufzeichnungen über Bewertungseinladungen
Dieses Unternehmen hat Kunden in letzter Zeit nicht zur Bewertungsabgabe eingeladen, daher sind die Bewertungen möglicherweise nicht repräsentativ.
Hat 98 % seiner negativen Bewertungen beantwortet
Antwortet meist innerhalb von 2 Wochen
So nutzt dieses Unternehmen Trustpilot
Erfahren Sie, woher die Bewertungen stammen und wie sie ausgewertet und moderiert werden.
I believed in Grass. I don't anymore.
I don't write reviews very often, especially negative ones. I'd rather spend my time building things than complaining. But after waiting more than a year to see how this project rewarded the people who helped build its network, I think it's only fair to share my experience.
I wasn't chasing a quick airdrop. I wasn't running a browser extension on an old laptop for a few weeks. I invested because I genuinely believed in the idea.
I run a fairly substantial homelab with multiple always-on systems. I've spent years building reliable infrastructure, so I understand exactly what it costs—both financially and in time—to keep systems online 24/7. I knew what I was contributing, and I was happy to contribute because I believed Grass was building something worth supporting.
I even bought one of the $90 Grass shirts because I wanted to support the project beyond simply running nodes.
That's how much confidence I had in it.
Looking back, I regret that decision.
My final results
*520 Days Active
*25 Devices
*1,613,809 Uptime Points
*518.16 Network Points
Estimated Allocation: $2.61 USDC
After more than 520 days, that's what my contribution was apparently worth.
Not even enough to cover the electricity used by the equipment that helped support the network. I wasn't expecting to become rich. That would have been unrealistic.
What I did expect was that over a year of consistent participation would be recognised in a way that reflected the value contributors were providing.
Instead, I watched the reward model evolve to place far greater emphasis on Network Points, leaving huge amounts of accumulated Uptime Points with very little practical value.
Whether that was intentional or simply poor communication, the outcome is the same.
I've lost confidence in the project.
Running infrastructure isn't free.
*It costs electricity.
*It costs hardware wear.
*It costs internet bandwidth.
*It costs maintenance.
*It costs time.
Those costs are carried by the community, not by Grass.
The money itself isn't what disappointed me most.
What disappointed me was what the payout represented.
If over 520 days, across 25 devices, with more than 1.6 million Uptime Points, my contribution is considered to be worth $2.61, then I honestly don't believe long-term supporters are being valued fairly.
Grass had an interesting vision, and that's why I supported it. Unfortunately, I no longer feel that support goes both ways.
**My nodes are now offline**
I won't be recommending Grass to anyone. If you're considering joining, don't rely solely on marketing or leaderboard screenshots. Read the experiences of long-term participants, compare the resources they invested with what they ultimately received, and decide for yourself whether it's a fair exchange.
I genuinely hope Grass improves because the concept has potential.
At this point, however, I no longer have confidence in the project.
*********************************************
***********Added for grass reply -*************
Derek, this response actually confirms the problem I raised rather than answering it.
Grass's own documentation states that the updated points system was introduced and became effective in Epoch 11 of Stage 2.
So telling users they received little because they didn't earn enough Network Points completely sidesteps the issue: Network Points did not exist as part of the points system for the first 10 epochs.
Grass itself says the early priority was rewarding uptime and network growth, and that Uptime Points helped build the foundation of the network. You can't now dismiss hundreds of days of that contribution by saying, effectively, "you didn't get many Network Points," when that metric was introduced halfway through Stage 2.
And blaming my connection is particularly weak. I accumulated 1.6 million Uptime Points across 520 active days. If Grass believes my connection was unstable or my software outdated enough to justify a $2.61 reward, then provide the data: connection history, bandwidth actually routed, utilisation before Epoch 11, utilisation after Epoch 11, and exactly how both point systems were weighted in my allocation.
I don't have an issue with USDC. I don't expect Grass to reward hardware I chose to buy either. Neither is the complaint.
I'm happy to accept a $2.61 result if Grass can transparently demonstrate how 520 days of contribution produced it. That's what I've been asking for.

Antwort von Grass
From now the game is change.
This will be a trash project that loses investors due to the indiscretion in providing information about the Airdrop for which we have been waiting for a long time and sacrificing devices for a year and the rewards you get are not enough to pay for public toilets, it's a shame you will be ruined if you don't change the point system to be wiser.

Antwort von Grass
Been running nodes for grass for 2 years and they scammed us, they're not rewarding users like they're supposed to... please do not use use grass and if you're already a user please uninstall their software ASAP. Thanks for nothing Grass scammers

Antwort von Grass
3M+ Points 1.5years of up time , 17 devices , Got 0.98USDC , while my referrals with 1 device and 300,000 pts got 0.45USC. Absolute mess. Probably i paid 1000 times more than what i got. Absolute shi***! Well played grass , we have "sheeped".

Antwort von Grass
Pure scam in season 2, season 1 was good but this time they purely scammed us by using our net and the highest reward is approx. 15 to 30 usdc like wth... please everyone stay away from this shitty project and report as much as you can.

Antwort von Grass
LOOL 4 bucks, 4 BUCKS you’re an absolute scam

Antwort von Grass
another scam website, please don't click or interaction with this website

Antwort von Grass
Scam site they have not paid people for the bandwoth they took do not download if you want passive incpme this is not the way they have paid people for many months now

Antwort von Grass
No airdrop, it's understandable if they are building but they have to be transparent about it because they are using our bandwidth and not keeping us informed of what's going on so that's a big No.

Antwort von Grass
Aucun airdrop depuis 2024 et communauté inactive.
On sait même pas où le projet en est.
A éviter.

Antwort von Grass
Tous simplement du vol aller chez la concurrence eu il n’efface pas vos gain sans raison

Antwort von Grass
Epoch 15 but still stage 2. It looks suspicious. I wonder when stage 3 starts? Maybe this is just another scam.They use our resources for free, there is no payment in sight.

Antwort von Grass
Two years and no rewards. One airdrop last year and i missed that because my wallet wasn't set up aparently. No communication or explanation of what is going on.

Antwort von Grass
Hello Grass team I have mine about 200k grass coins. So how do I exchange from my coins or what is the market rate for the stage 2. How much should I be expecting for 1 Grass=$?
I am new to this and just started. Just curious 🤔.
Thanks.

Antwort von Grass
Grass airdrop is first of it's kind, and the best as far as I am concern. But problem is abaut this stage 2 , most of us are exosted financially, from frequent purchased of data for internet. We have waited for too long. I hope we will not see an epoch 14.

Antwort von Grass

Antwort von Grass
first off it wants me to connect a wallet why simply... Can't I just put in a wallet address and select which network.like Ethereum Solana etc feels very data intrusive there's no option. Also, my VPS shows up in Canada running around 1.3gbs speeds upload and download average.... How comes there's no option to set up with vPs? Also, is there any actual liquidity in your coin?

Antwort von Grass
Their customer service is great, they have UI friendly and very easy to navigate

Antwort von Grass
It’s great and very responsive to the issue I was having — it fixed it right away.

Antwort von Grass
Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.
Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.
Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.
Hier finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.
Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.
Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.