World Economic Forum Bewertungen 

Commies. zz

Real threat against the democratic western world at this time.

A group of billioners trying to act like a god and take control.

So Klaus Schwab and his goons from World Economic Forum thinks they are smart and own my life with their 2030 Agenda, human & animal depopulation, fake plandemics, censorships, causing war with innocent people, chemtrails that are bad for health?

They say the train is best for enviroment but instead investing in railway, especially freight, they invest in trucks which they are dangerous on road, dirty and constantly attacking german freight operator, the goons from WEF are really trying to destroy DBC with their price rising to companies just to switch on trucks.

You meant to say the trucks are greener future! Your article is just waste of time, greenwashing, dont know the one train replaces 40 trucks! Sadly i can't post link.

Electric cars are dangerous to enviroment, take example of Felicity Ace car carrier that has been caused by fire on battery of electric car by Porsche (Volkswagen).

WEF is greatest danger in the Earth that needs to be taken away from this planet. Marvin the Martian from Mars is very angey indeed at Forum.

I have no covid vaccine, im alive, i do not wear brainwashed masks, i've throw TV out of my house, im hoping the mask brainwashed lovers are in basement even today. Wef has no rights to control my life, and all of you should be shamed!

Word forum is biggest scam, and i hate mention it, even internet forums are full of censorships and i'm glad i moved over, life is much better.

World will live better when WEForum collapses. Enough of Ukraine war.

I do not support future of greenwashing with WEForum!

DownwithWEF
Humanrights

This website consistently publishes data which is falsified and misleading, even when it has been proven to be untrue. In today's age they should be labelled with a 'disinformation' tag.

I am reviewing WEF's news crawler. I had high hopes for the World Economic Forum free news service when I signed up. WEF claims to be “committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic, and other leaders of society to shape global, regional, and industry agendas.” They offer a targeted news crawler email service that has user-selected tags at a monthly cost of $30 and $90. For this amount of money I expect accurate curated news articles from reliable sources. Fact-checking websites like mediabiasfactcheck.com rate them highly, for example they state, "In general, WEF’s website produces quality, in-depth reports, and initiatives related to global economic reform. All information is well-sourced and factual and presented with minimal bias in wording" However, when I fact-checked two articles, one on a Fuel Forge by Prometheus Fuels and another on a hexagonal ocean fish farming pod system, I found biased one-sided articles designed to promote companies. Both articles left out significant negatives for the products. The Prometheus Fuels article left out economic discussion of why they were impractical. The fish farming article left out problems from pollution due to the high use of fish pharmaceuticals, the tendency to spread sea lice parasites, and heavy concentrations of fish excrement. So the fact-checking site was wrong. Next, the head of the group, Klaus Schwab, was found to have a conflict of interest because he receives an annual salary of $1 million and got into trouble due to using his personal property as a tax-expense when he was primarily using it as a residence. So the founder appears unethical and money motivated rather than ethically motivated. It is impossible to leave any feedback on the articles, there is no up or down feedback arrows, no place to put comments (which wastes a valuable opportunity to quickly assess article quality) and not even a contact email. Talk about a major snub for their non-paying members. If I have to pay a high membership fee for premium services then I expect good quality analysis, not a low-grade newscrawler that I can assemble using Feedly.com. The support from fact-checking websites is particularly worrisome as it indicates problems with them also. Still, I get some value from the free membership and many of the articles are useful however the lack of feedback and one-sidedness is a major problem from a group that touts itself as ethical and concerned about the future. My suspicion is that the WEF could be used as a tool to spread disinformation designed to profit disreputable businesses when then economically support Schwab. Until the website is improved take their articles with a large shaker of healthy skepticism and research whether or not they accurately represent the topic. If the article leaves out problems then it is most likely biased and promotional.

This collection of globalist overlords is preparing to fundamentally change human relations around the world, yet nobody has ever heard of them, much less voted for them.

Since the emergence of Coronavirus-19, my government has been following WEF guildlines, I know people who have lost their small businesses because of it, while large corporate chains have done fine.