Designhomeplan Ltd Bewertungen 

Antwort von Designhomeplan Ltd

Aktualisiert am 24. März 2023

Sailesh Shah is one of the Director's of property investment/management company in Croydon. This is an unfair review. I hope that fair minded people read my side of the story. Or ask for testimonials. I've got loads. This review is about a refund of £500.

Sailesh Shah owes me outstanding fees for getting him planning permission for a cute micro house 37m2 in Croydon. It was a tough planning permission and Sailesh Shah made a "no win no fee deal". I won and got him planning permission last year, He has not paid those fees but prefers to write reviews online instead. I am happy to show anyone the drawings and decision notice. I really love the design, it was ingenious and we got planning by a hair's breadth.

By definition what Sailesh Shah has described above is not fraud, "it's much ado about nothing".

Let me explain my side of the dispute.
I was instructed by Sailesh Shah on another project to prepare planning and building regs. The planning was approved I have a 95% planning success rate. All of my building regs drawings have a disclaimer that "all measurements must be verified on site". Sailesh Shah instructed a builder to build without instructing my services to inspect the works. This is the traditional way to have the person who prepared the drawings to check the work on site that they are being built as expected. This gives your work an extra layer of precision. The builder built the loft roof higher than the ridge!!! Then he clad the excess roof height with white upvc that was visible from a distance. I've never seen a builder do that in 22years. A planning officer walking past saw it and served an enforcement notice. Sailesh Shah wants me to pay for all of the building work to rectify the problem. If you need more information about this project. I will be willing to show you drawings, pictures and the emails from the enforcement officer. For the record, nobody should build a dormer roof higher than the ridge. Period.

There are usually 4 reasons why a client goes online and calls me and my company names. It's for one or all of the following reasons listed below
1. They are not my client in the first place
2. They want me to pay for something that is not my fault
3. They want a refund that in my opinion is way over and beyond what's due to them
4. They are too impatient for an independent body to make a decision on the matter so they prefer to go to the court of public opinion.

I did A level Maths, : ) I'm not going to agree with incorrect figures. It's ok to disagree without calling people names. I hope that fair minded people read my side of the story. Or ask for testimonials. I've got loads.

Antwort von Designhomeplan Ltd

Aktualisiert am 24. März 2023

We got full planning permission for Katherine's house. It was 1st floor extension and loft. It was a tricky planning application and we were successful.
We are architectural designers we have a 95% planning success rate. That’s why I get 5 star reviews.

Katherine did something very odd, fired us out of the blue and got new builders to work on her project while keeping our tools and then sent me a bill for 100K.
Ask yourself what you would do in this situation. Would you pay £100 extra on anything?

Her review below is in connection with other subcontractors which we use for our building work. These men have been tried and tested on other projects and done well. One client can bring out the best in a person, another client can bring out the worst. Clients always have a choice to find their own builders.

Below are some of the reasons why I get 1-star reviews for subcontracting building work
1. The reviewer is not my client
2. The review is in connection with a refund that is greater than what they paid or are entitled to
3. The review is in connection with work that they want but haven’t paid for
4. The review is in connection doing unethical work or work that’s not in line with my company policy
5. The reviewer is verbally or physically abusive
This review falls under reason number 2

Antwort von Designhomeplan Ltd

Aktualisiert am 24. März 2023

We got full planning permission for Marlice's mother's house. It was large stunning wrap-around extension. It was a tricky planning application and we were successful. Marlice is not my client. Carole above is her mother and Richard above is her uncle.

We are architectural designers we have a 95% planning success rate. That’s why I get 5 star reviews.
The review below is in connection with other subcontractors which we use for our building work. These men have been tried and tested on other projects and done well. One client can bring out the best in a person, another client can bring out the worst. Clients always have a choice to find their own builders.

As a reader ask yourself if you would work for an abusive person. Marlice has abused me verbally despite not being my client.

Below are some of the reasons why I get 1star reviews for subcontracting building work
1. The reviewer is not my client
2. The review is in connection with a refund that is greater than what they paid or are entitled to
3. The review is in connection with work that they want but haven’t paid for
4. The review is in connection doing unethical work or work that’s not in line with my company policy
5. The reviewer is verbally or physically abusive

This review falls under reason number 1, 2, 3 & 5

Marlice has been verbally abusive and this is her 2nd 1 star review in connection with this subject.
Marlice has written 100's negative reviews on other platforms.