I used to subscribe for several years, but the articles changed, they were noticabl biased and far leftist leaning. the website was bought by a Hamas extremist Hassan Yousseff in 2025, no wonder it i... Mehr ansehen
Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren
Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren
Das sagen Bewerter
Current veteran and military news is good. But liberal views on all stores is not good. It's really apparent that the writers and staff are liberals. How about some balance or lean to the right... Mehr ansehen
I am a Viet Nam era vet, and the trash Military.com publishes is BS. Trump is building back the backbone of our military and disposing of the human garbage, moral breaking issues, the woke age... Mehr ansehen
Very biased, leans liberal. In an article on Tim Walz and JD Vance, their wording for Walz was ‘received an honorable discharge’. The wording for Vance was ‘he left the military’. Couldn’t be more b... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmensdetails
Informationen, die aus verschiedenen externen Quellen stammen
Founded in 1999, the site has been a division of Monster Worldwide since 2004.
Kontaktinformationen
Boston Post Road 133, 02493, Weston, Vereinigtes Königreich
- military.com
Keine Aufzeichnungen über Bewertungseinladungen
Dieses Unternehmen hat seine Kunden nicht zur Bewertungsabgabe eingeladen, daher sind die Bewertungen möglicherweise nicht repräsentativ.
So nutzt dieses Unternehmen Trustpilot
Erfahren Sie, woher die Bewertungen stammen und wie sie ausgewertet und moderiert werden.
Das haben sich andere Leute angesehen
Liberal platform disguised as…
Liberal platform disguised as mainstream military source of honest information. Smells of deep state darkness. Get out the rat traps! Expose these evil actors!
Current veteran and military news is…
Current veteran and military news is good. But liberal views on all stores is not good. It's really apparent that the writers and staff are liberals. How about some balance or lean to the right for a while?
Military.com used be fairly moderate
Military.com used be fairly moderate, but since they eliminated the comment section on all the articles, they have gone full-blown liberal. They seem to be focused on trying to manipulate service members and veterans into believing their liberal viewpoints. This is painfully obvious in today's article about the potential government shut down. They never once mentioned why the Republicans disagree with the proposed bill. Please do your own research on anything miliary.com says.
Report on what is not what might be
I have been trying to follow military.com for quite some time now because I am involved in an organization that recruits for the military personnel. However, I can no longer bear with the liberal slant of the articles. The one that came out 20 Dec 24 is one such example. In it the article clearly used emotionally laden scenarios that are not true to the current event to create unreasonable fear regarding potential funding delay. Even the headline picture was misleading in that it was from 2013 not the present. Speculation about what might occur is not news. Report on what is not what might be.
I no longer care to read this propaganda
Used to enjoy reading these articles but in the last couple years they’ve turned into a leftist propaganda platform. They blatantly twist statements made by any and all Republican politicians in a way that can easily disproven by just turning on your tv or by pulling up videos on YouTube or social media. The writers are clearly detached from the ground truth of what is actually going on with military personnel, and would rather spend more time pushing woke agendas that have been deteriorating our strength as a world power. It’s a joke, and a direct reflection of the direction the military leadership has been going for the last four years. Our military is weaker, and softer than ever and our adversaries think we are a joke. This reading material only fuels the fire in this regard, and it has emboldened our adversaries to take actions against our allies that they never would have even considered in the past. I don’t read these articles for your opinion; I read them to be informed about current events that affect our armed forces. It would be really nice if they would stop pushing out this weak garbage and start producing reading material that actually keeps us informed on relevant topics, with factual information.
M.COM LEANING AND NOT CENTER OF POLITICS
As a prior military dependent and a retired military service member, I have noticed over the years that military.com has gone from a center standing media to a supporter of FAR LEFT liberal agendas. This review is my personal feeling and this is my belief
How is it possible for unfriendly…
How is it possible for unfriendly Military Employer to upload job offers on Military.com?
And why you guys keep ignoring my emails?
not trustworthy in thier articles...lies
used to appreciate very informative information but not anymore. very biased views one-sided opinions and very wrong in supplying what they deem correct information. have had personal experience with several stories and events that they completely told incorrectly. In other words, they lied. do not follow them.
Very biased
Very biased, leans liberal. In an article on Tim Walz and JD Vance, their wording for Walz was ‘received an honorable discharge’. The wording for Vance was ‘he left the military’. Couldn’t be more biased if they tried. Both individuals received an honorable discharge. And that’s just the latest example. Nothing more than another liberal mouthpiece.
They have liberal hack writers
They have liberal hack writers. They need to be unbiased and just write stories. Military pubs don't need peoples political BS.
Military.com is NOT a government or…
Military.com is NOT a government or military website. Their progressive ideology creeps into many of their articles. Many of their articles are more opinion than facts. In short the editors are focused more on their social agenda than accurately writing about the warfighter, events or new technologies. In other words a Digital bird cage liner .
I’m deleting military.com
I’m deleting military.com. As a 30 year active soldier and 20 years as a civilian contractor I was hoping they would be an impartial organization, but I was so wrong. Every month I read about the one sided left and it’s so obvious that this organization tilts liberal that I want no more part of it.
CW5 retired Scott Hudson
Military.com who should be doing there…
Military.com who should be doing there best to enrich the lives of service men and women and DOD personnel for the betterment of active and Veterans of the United States. However a youtuber named Robbbryde has raised many questions about our liberties being denied by the government that prior service people are never released from the DOD until about 60 years of age because we still carry a classification of IH with selective service even after discharge. These benefits are being denied under Military rule. Law of War Manual. If properly executed all Veterans Honorably discharged and active should be a protected class and recognized by the Geneva Convention under International Law. Robbbryder should be recognized for his great contribution to America we all know and love.
Easy fix...goes unfixed...and now no communicate
I've been with military.com since they've started. I've run into a few problems with them. The latest one takes the Cake.
I had a simple request.
Years ago I signed up under an email I no longer use. I have several units started up under that email address but was told when I dropped the email just to sign up under my new address.
I wanted access to my unit pages...one has 90 something members..the other I believe needed my approval to join so it's 0 members as I can't retrieve the info because I don't have access the the email any longer.
My request was simple...to remove my current email so I can attach it to my old email and recieve info about my unit pages.
They mistakingly took down the wrong account.
We went back and forth with 13 emails each time they tried to explain it in a way that was wrong. They actually told me that the old email isn't in their database. I had to inform them it isn't in there because the account was wrongfully removed by someone that works there.
I requested that they let me work with one person. To try and resolve it correctly and now they won't even answer an email.
Although at first trying to be attentive. They are not very knowledgeable and/or equipped to service the website.
So funktioniert Trustpilot
Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.
Unternehmen können über automatische Einladungen zur Bewertungsabgabe einladen. Diese Bewertungen werden mit dem Hinweis „verifiziert“ versehen, um darauf hinzuweisen, dass es sich um echte Erfahrungen handelt.
Erfahren Sie mehr über die verschiedenen Arten von Bewertungen.
Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.
Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.
Hier finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.
Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.
Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.








